Yes, that is in effect option 2.
Tim B.
Sent from BlueMail
On 11 Aug 2016, 9:11 p.m., at 9:11 p.m., Tony Whitmore via Hampshire <hampshire@???> wrote:
>Hi Tim,
>
>On 10/08/16 22:59, Tim Brocklehurst via Hampshire wrote:
>> We have three options (this will form the agenda for the meeting):
>>
>> 1) A new committee is elected and the LUG continues as normal.
>Existing
>> committee members can stand for re-election. I will not be standing.
>-
>> Please submit nominations to chairman@???
>>
>> 2) The committee is disbanded and the constitution suitably updated
>to
>> enable a sole LUG member to act as benefactor; to maintain the
>mailing
>> list and optionally the website as they see fit with a suitable
>degree of
>> consultation from the membership. In this case the current LUG funds
>will
>> not be handed over to the benefactor.
>>
>> 3) The group is wound up. The mailing list and website will be taken
>> off-line and the domain-name either retained for 12 months, or given
>to
>> another LUG in Hampshire. No funds will be retained (see below).
>
>Is just leaving the hants.lug.org.uk domain and the mailing list intact
>
>an option? Presumably that is zero cost and would allow what little
>traffic there is to the mailing list (and whatever to the website) to
>continue.
>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Tim Brocklehurst
>>
>
>Thanks to you and the other committee members for you efforts in
>keeping
>things ticking over.
>
>Tony
>
>--
>Please post to: Hampshire@???
>Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
>LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
>--------------------------------------------------------------
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
