On 18 July 2014 10:04, jay bennie <jay@???> wrote:
> may be i see the plethora of freedoms of open critisim, courts that can
> and do prosecute and voting for all as a panacea.
>
the freedoms of open criticism which, when exercised against the
powers-that-be, place your identity on the retrospective search algorithms
that immediately aggregate your entire potted history for the past 10
years? yeah, I'd call that a panacea, too, though not for the same people I
would guess.
> what i also see is a lack of ability for legitimate spying on persons
> breaking laws, polititions and business interests making secret deals
> outside of law and police abuse of power.
>
>
The problem is that "spying" isn't being done on persons breaking laws, it
is done on everyone at all times. Right now you are being surveiled by the
powers-that-be whether you like to believe it or not.
> I also see 40% of the population read crap and base there opinion on
> retoric and spin, and have an idealistic notion of a perfect socity and a
> personalised view of right and wrong
>
36% of that statistic was made-up on the spot.
> people are corrupt! people break laws, fact.
>
that isn't being argued against.
> you need tools to collect evidence, and courts of elected or just persons
> to make judgements of right and wrong... anything less is folly.
>
nor is that.
--
Daniel Llewellyn
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
