gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x56d04100.hantslug.org.uk.21350': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Wed Apr 18 13:38:36 2007 BST
gpg: using DSA key B2C27BC21C335860
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:50:47PM +0100, Paul Tansom wrote:
> ** Alan Pope <alan@???> [2007-04-18 12:21]:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0100, Paul Tansom wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. I'm assuming Feisty is an LTS release
> >
> > Why?
> > It isn't.
>
> Because it is a major version number upgrade. One of the touted
> advantages of Ubuntu is that it is more up to date than pure Debian. I
> consider the LTS versions to be equivalent (in intended usage at least)
> of Debian Stable, so if the LTS releases don't keep up with the major
> versions then this advantage has gone.
I think you misunderstand the Ubuntu numbering scheme. The version
number is <year-2000>.<month>, so you guarantee to get a "major
version" change every year, and that the "minor version" changes by
approximately 6 (mod 6) each time (usually 04 to 10 each time).
My understanding is that they plan on making an LTS release every
2-2.5 years.
> Any idea when the next LTS release is due? I've not managed to find that
> information in the FAQ or by searching on the site (for things like
> roadmap, release date, etc.).
>
> Maybe my view of what should be happening doesn't match with what is
> happening. I see LTS as the server side package and the rest as the
> desktop (much like I see stable for the server side and testing for the
> desktop - although with a short pause just after a new stable release to
> let testing settle again!).
I would say that this isn't an accurate view of either Ubuntu's or
Debian's intent.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- Once is happenstance; twice is coincidence; three times ---
is enemy action.