Re: [Hampshire] GMANE integration with HantsLUG

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Dom Rodriguez
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] GMANE integration with HantsLUG
Hi Andy,

> Sorry for the late reply I've been away for 3 weeks.


No worries.

> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Dom Rodriguez wrote:


>> I currently use GMANE (https://gmane.org) for my newsgroups at the
>> moment, and found that HantsLUG (or any UK LUG mailing list for that matter, AFAIK)
>> wasn't on the server.
>
> I'd not heard of GMANE until this post, but as far as I know no, it's
> not on that server. I'd also point out that this is a mailing list not
> a newsgroup and that they are two quite different things, but that
> might just be the pedant in me talking...


Good point, I may have got mixed up to be honest, but thanks for
pointing that out to me.

>
>> If HantsLUG (or any other UK LUG mailing list) was to be added to GMANE,
>> what would you guys think about it?
>
> Where and how the list is archived has been a very hot topic in the
> past, and some people have very strong feeling on the subject.
>
> However the list is a very different place now than it was 5 or 10
> years ago and since no one has leaped in and screamed "NO!" or made
> any kind of comment at all then I'm guessing most of the people with
> strong feelings on the subject are no longer paying much attention to
> the list.
>
> The biggest concern would be publicising people's email addresses to a
> wider forum, assuming GMANE anonymises email addresses and that the
> archiving started from now, with some announcement to the list, rather
> than importing the whole archive I doubt anyone would care either way.
>
> If GMANE doesn't hide user email addresses or you are proposing a
> whole scale import of the archives, that is probably not very
> acceptable.
>
> As for other LUG lists, each LUG is a separate entity, you would have
> to ask each one individually for their opinion.


I understand that completely, good points there, especially with regards
to spam control (when will the madness end!).

I just checked on GMANE again, and although it doesn't seem like that
they anonymise email adddress by default, it does however have an option
for 'address obfuscation', which can be enabled with a email header in
user's messages or globally.

For reference, the page for address obfuscation is located here:
http://gmane.org/tmda.php

Understood about each separate LUG as well.

I would tend to agree with you on the if archiving starting from now,
especially with the annoucement to the list, if we were to do so.

For the moment, I'm not too worried about doing GMANE archiving /
connection to the HantsLUG mailing list, my first email was more to get
a idea of people's thoughts about it.

Thanks for your input Andy, and Paul too! :-)

Regards,
--
Dom Rodriguez
GPG Key: 78F96514D901B93F - shymega@???
Email: shymega@???
Website: http://shymega.github.io

--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------