Re: [Hampshire] Arch vs Debian

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Imran Chaudhry
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Arch vs Debian
Absolutely.

It's called vim.
On 10 Oct 2014 08:58, "Gordon Scott" <gordon@???> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 20:31 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> > I kept out of the systemd debates at the time, but once the decision was
> > made, I got myself a quick intro to it from one of my tech guys. I was
> > very favourably impressed. I don't want to start a war about it, but it
> > isn't the demon (hehe) it's been made out to be by some.
>
> I think this is all down to one's personal attitude to risk in the
> context.
>
> If on doesn't mind if a machine breaks for a while, or indeed if the
> challenge of fixing it is "what makes you tick", then you may want to go
> for the highest risk option.
>
> If your machine is a tool to do a job and it breaking is a significant
> concern, you'll likely go for a low risk option.
>
> The only person who can decide what risk is appropriate is oneself.
> Everyone else just has their opinion.
>
> Now editors, that's another matter ... there is only one true editor,
> but I'm not going to tell you what it is :-D
>
> Gordon.
>
> > --
> > Linux for Web Devlopers - 15 Mistakes to Avoid: http://goo.gl/2SKjYL
> >
> > "You can't live a perfect day without doing something for someone
> > who will never be able to repay you."
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>

--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------