On 8 October 2014 10:24, Leo <linux@???> wrote:
> I use Arch on my laptop and it takes some maintenance when I upgrade (e.g.
> merging configs, fixing package clashes), and I was wondering how it
> compared to Debian Unstable? Has anyone used both; does Debian Unstable
> require more/less/similar amount of maintenance to Arch?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
Hi Leo,
Why do you want to run Debian unstable instead of Debian stable?
I've never run "sid" (the Debian Unstable codename) but I know people
who run it as their day-to-day OS.
--
Key fingerprint = EF78 310C C517 9564 9ECA 82F6 68FA E621 17E1 5D16
http://about.me/imranchaudhry
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
