I think the problem with phoneblocks is the same reason why you don't see
laptop blocks.
Good idea in theory, but far too expensive in practice.
The technology moves ahead so quickly, the standardized blocks would be
help back by their standardized interfaces and connectors.
On 26 September 2013 15:46, Peter B. <petyrb@???> wrote:
> Think this has fallen over before it got on its feet. The main phone
> manufacturers have pretty much said that they will not back this. You can
> see why they would not want to standardise their phones, competition and all
> On 14 Sep 2013 17:46, "Peter Salisbury" <
> peterthevicar@???> wrote:
>
>> On 14 September 2013 08:30, Tim <tim@???> wrote:
>> >
>> > As some of you like your non-mainstream phones thought you might be
>> interested in this
>> >
>> > http://phoneblocks.com/
>> >
>> > Tim
>> >
>> > --
>> > Please post to: Hampshire@???
>> > Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
>> > LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I really like the idea but won't it end up being too heavy as the
>> structural breadboard and the module boxes are all extra weight? It's
>> like old cars with everything bolted to the chassis which were
>> replaced by designs with a structural shell.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> --
>> Please post to: Hampshire@???
>> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
>> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
