Re: [Hampshire] (OT) NAS and USB3 connections

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] (OT) NAS and USB3 connections

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x572c2100.hantslug.org.uk.9148': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Mon Apr 22 16:38:49 2013 BST
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hello,

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:30:06PM +0100, Chris Dennis wrote:
> On 22/04/13 14:44, Andy Smith wrote:
> >And yet I would still choose storage over a 1Gig Ethernet as opposed
> >to over USB3.
>
> Why? :)
>
> There seems to be a lot of aversion on this list to USB-connected
> hard drives. What are the advantages of Ethernet-connected ones?


Every USB storage device I've ever used, including on USB3, has been
slow and unreliable regardless of the theoretical limits of a USB
bus.

Take the USB2 480Mbit/s theoretical performance: have you EVER got
60MByte/etc to a USB disk, even as a streaming read? And then try it
for random writes, and compare that to SATA-II doing same.

Like the popular Meatloaf song goes,
I'll use USB for keyboard and mice and wifi adapters and and.. but
I won't use USB for storage

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------