In general I think it is a good idea.
Facebook has a good process for multiple admins of a page, but I've not
seen a good solution for twitter other than relying on one person. Anyone
know of anything.
Anton
On 27 Jan 2013 17:48, "Alan Pope" <alan.pope@???> wrote:
> Hullo,
>
> It struck me today that the LUG doesn't have any kind of active presence
> on social networks (such as Twitter, Facebook and Google+). I have seen
> other LUGs promote their meetings (and not much else) via these networks
> and it struck me as a good way to reach a wider audience than the website
> and mailing list currently do.
>
> I wondered if it might be worth setting up a presence on each of the above
> networks and have some people responsible for posting when the LUG has a
> meeting.
>
> To be clear, this isn't to replace the mailing list or website, and isn't
> targeting _you_ because you are already on the list. It's to target
> potential new people.
>
> Opinions / flames...
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Alan Pope
> Engineering Manager
>
> Canonical - Product Strategy
> +44 (0) 7973 620 164
> alan.pope@???
> http://ubuntu.com/
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/**mailman/listinfo/hampshire<https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire>
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--
>
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
