Re: [Hampshire] Scamming call

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Victor Churchill
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Scamming call
On 25 January 2013 19:37, Keith Edmunds <kae@???> wrote:

> OK, I can agree naive rather than dishonest. However, that does not
> absolve them of responsibility for their actions.
>


Yep, I'd probably add "ignorant" (in the non pejorative sense) and possibly
"desperate" too. I would agree with the general tone here that it's the
leaders not the footsoldiers who are to blame, but the latter who get the
flames.



--
best regards,

Victor Churchill,
Bournemouth
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------