Re: [Hampshire] LVM problems

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MHugo Mills at <-
MHugo Mills at ->

Reply to this message
Author: Vic
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] LVM problems

> # lvresize --setphysicalvolumesize 117016887296b /dev/sda5
> # lvresize /dev/sda5

I think those should be "pvresize", shouldn't they?

The first one *might* also be unnecessary - but we're into speculation
territory here, as I don't think I've ever had to use pvresize...

Vic.



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Hampshire] LVM problemsRe: [Hampshire] LVM problems->
Hampshire LUG Mailing List Archive administrated by WebmasterLurker (version 2.3)