1024 x 768 is definitely the native res? I would have thought a 32" would
be more like 1360 x 768. This is a very rough and ready xorg, but see how
it goes.
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Samsung"
ModelName "Unidentified"
HorizSync 30 - 61
VertRefresh 56 - 75
Modeline "1024x768_60.00" 63.50 1024 1072 1176 1328 768 771 775
798 -hsync +vsync
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Driver "nvidia"
VendorName "GeForce 8400 GS"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Device0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1024x768"
EndSubSection
EndSection
On 7 September 2010 16:59, Rob Malpass <linux@???> wrote:
> *From:* hampshire-bounces@??? [mailto:
> hampshire-bounces@???] *On Behalf Of *Russell Morris
> *Sent:* 05 September 2010 20:55
>
> *To:* Hampshire LUG Discussion List
> *Subject:* Re: [Hampshire] FW: Missing xorg.conf
>
>
>
> Hi again!
>
>
>
> What resolution do you desire? If you let me know what make/model monitor
> you have, the offer is still there for me to knock up an xorg.conf that
> 'should' work.
>
>
>
> Russell.
>
>
>
> Thanks Russell
>
>
>
> I'm afraid I can't tell you much about my monitor - other than it's a 32"
> LCD TV made by Samsung - the only model number I can find anywhere is on the
> remote and it's bn59-00454. 1024x768 is the highest resolution (and my
> preferred) I've ever had it running in. Rather annoyingly - it is very
> quick to switch to standby and slow to come back up - but it has been very
> reliable with Windows in 1024x768 with nvidia graphics cards. I just feel
> such a berk for changing a working xorg.conf!
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance as ever
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Rob
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
