Re: [Hampshire] Hampshire Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: oro thus
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Hampshire Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15
On 18/05/2010, hampshire-request@???
<hampshire-request@???> wrote:
> Send Hampshire mailing list submissions to
>     hampshire@???

>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     hampshire-request@???

>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     hampshire-owner@???

>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Hampshire digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Test 6/6 please ignore (Dee Earley)

>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:16 +0100
> From: Dee Earley <dee@???>
> Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Test 6/6 please ignore
> To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List <hampshire@???>
> Message-ID: <4BF1B220.8010507@???>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 16/05/2010 12:06, Andy Smith wrote:
>> Hi Dee,
>>
>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:53:40PM +0100, Dee Earley wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2010 20:12, Keith Edmunds wrote:
>>>> Mail sent to you will have the mailbox it is sent to _somewhere_ in the
>>>> headers (otherwise how do you suppose the mail gets to you?).
>>>
>>> By using details that are not passed as part of the headers.
>>>
>>> The SMTP protocol specifies a envelope to, from, and the data.
>>> The data can be completely unrelated to who it is actually being
>>> delivered to or from.
>>
>> But it's the envelope to we're discussing here.
>
> I was commenting on the "how does it get to you" which is not via the
> information in the headers.
>
>>>    From your email (irrelevant headers stripped):
>>> ====================================================
>>> Return-Path:<hampshire-bounces@???>
>>> Received: from mailman.lug.org.uk (mailman.lug.org.uk [217.147.93.71])
>>>     by jane.earlsoft.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4FJCaEo006421
>>>     for<dee@???>; Sat, 15 May 2010 19:12:36 GMT

>>
>> Is dee@??? not the email address you're subscribed with?
>
> Yes, my server happens to log it in the received headers, but it's not
> guaranteed.
> The point was that if my server (or any other between mailman and the
> mailbox) didn't, then it wouldn't be in the headers at all.
> Mailman does not list the destination.
>
> --
> Dee Earley (dee@???)
>
> irc:    irc://irc.blitzed.org/
> web:    http://www.earlsoft.co.uk
> phone:  +44 (0)780 8369596

>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> End of Hampshire Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15
> *****************************************
>


--
Sent from my mobile device