Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-+++++\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M\MMMMMMHugo Mills at <-
MM.M..MAdrian Bridgett at ->
Author: Chris Smith
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x56884100.hantslug.org.uk.10491': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Wed May 5 08:08:33 2010 BST
gpg: using DSA key 11BEF6408586B4B2
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hi all,

Thanks for all the advice. I think I will go with the 64-bit system
after all. :)

Chris
--
Chris Smith <cjs94@???>

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Hampshire] 32- or 64-bit distro?[Hampshire] problems with accessing startx.co.uk->
Hampshire LUG Mailing List Archive administrated by WebmasterLurker (version 2.3)