Re: [Hampshire] Xorg is hungry today...

2009/10/6 James Ashburner <hantslug@???>:
> Philip Stubbs wrote:
>>
>> I would say that it is ignorant to not accept that rpm based distroes
>> have had to catch up with Debian based ones with regards to package
>> management. If they did not have to catch up, why did they introduce
>> yum? Maybe now they have caught up, and for some, maybe they have
>> surpassed. It is good to learn from history, but to be fair to you, we
>> also need to learn from the present, and that is why I suggested a
>> compare and contrast session. Not as a, 'mine is better than yours'
>> but as a method of knocking down old walls and removing some bias
>> where it is not warranted.
>>
>>
>>
> My distro of choice uses apt and is rpm based, which side of the fence
> should I be sitting on? :)

That proves it! There is no fence. :-)

--
Philip Stubbs