Re: [Hampshire] Xorg is hungry today...

Philip Stubbs wrote:
>
> I would say that it is ignorant to not accept that rpm based distroes
> have had to catch up with Debian based ones with regards to package
> management. If they did not have to catch up, why did they introduce
> yum? Maybe now they have caught up, and for some, maybe they have
> surpassed. It is good to learn from history, but to be fair to you, we
> also need to learn from the present, and that is why I suggested a
> compare and contrast session. Not as a, 'mine is better than yours'
> but as a method of knocking down old walls and removing some bias
> where it is not warranted.
>
>
>
My distro of choice uses apt and is rpm based, which side of the fence
should I be sitting on? :)

James