gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x585f9100.hantslug.org.uk.31584': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Mon Jul 21 15:41:25 2025 BST
gpg:                using RSA key 898A78DCF0DC9B14FF90997EB472A863FC94FD2A
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hi Owain,
I would definitely check the rating on the patch lead; I've had the same 
thing (1000BaseTX renegotiating to 100BaseTX) when using Cat5 instead of 
Cat5e or Cat6 cable.
I'd found that Cat5 was stable on a short run and thought "Cat5 - 
supports Gig Ethernet, lovely" only to come a cropper when I moved the 
computer 3 feet further from the switch, with a longer Cat5 lead :-) 
Eventually, after crawling all over my system and trying different cards 
etc, I twigged and swapped in a Cat5e lead. Magic!
Cheers
Brad
On 20/07/2025 11:39, rmluglist2--- via Hampshire wrote:
> Thanks folks - a few things for me to check there.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hampshire <hampshire-bounces@???> On Behalf Of Nick
> Chalk via Hampshire
> Sent: 20 July 2025 11:20
> To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List <hampshire@???>
> Cc: Nick Chalk <nick@???>
> Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Networking hardware advice
> 
> On Sunday, 20 July, 2025, I wrote:
>> It sounds like there's a borderline out-of-spec cable in that run. One
>> or more of the switches is renegotiating to 100BaseTx from a higher
>> speed.
> 
> I should have added:
> 
> Next time it happens, check the link speed lights on each switch from the
> affected machine to the fibre router. That should show whether one link has
> renegotiated.
> 
> Nick.
> 
> --
> Nick Chalk ................. once a Radio Designer  Confidence is failing to
> understand the problem.
> 
> 
-- 
Brad Macpherson
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Manage subscription: 
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG website: 
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------