As far as I know usb 2.0 maxes out at 30mbps usb 3.0 100mbps for local data
transfer.
The speed iv think u r talking about will b relative to the adapter
transfer Loss etc I think and the speed of the cable u r using to transfer
itv from there. Also consider if u r using wireless it will b slower
still.
Maybe try the devolo type solution if u r using a local nas I.e. Home use
I echo Andys statement otherwise as cost etc for home gets personal and if
bought NEEDS a solution. :-D
Good luck
On 19 Apr 2013 20:12, "Andy Smith" <andy@???> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:00:15PM +0100, Martin N wrote:
> > Like this NAS:
> >
> http://www.dabs.com/products/zyxel-nsa325-2-bay-power-plus-nas-diskless--1-6ghz-cpu--7Z67.html?src=2
> >
> > The USB connections though i mentioned as being used to get data on
> > to the internal HDs
> > so I am wondering if it would not work for some reason and i would be
> > stuck with the slower
> > RJ45?
>
> I don't know, but you should expect USB (even USB3) to be slower
> than Ethernet.
>
> I personally would not use USB storage for anything but a temporary
> data transfer situation.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> --
> http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEAREDAAYFAlFxlvcACgkQIJm2TL8VSQv3EgCcCaZIGE6dGlzij84EUYSRSAp/
> Q5IAoPm8RtaecGHC5sA2OTBgjwD18R5o
> =riPX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface:
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------
