Re: [Hampshire] Hard disk failing

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Michael James Daffin
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Hard disk failing
Don't see why would wouldn't be able to just dd the data to the new disk,
assuming the new disk is larger. You can then use any partition manager
tool to increase the size of the partitions to fill the new space.

Worst case is it fails and you have to reinstall anyway... assuming you
have the time, and since you had the time to create the image in the first
place.

(Well, the actual worst case is you dd the wrong disk and lose everything
then panic and set your house on fire ;) )


On 24 November 2012 13:52, Tim Brocklehurst <timb@???>wrote:

> On Saturday 24 Nov 2012 13:17:12 Kevin Safford wrote:
> > gsmartcontrol reports that my hard disk is failing.
> >
> > I can still read and write to the disk, but I want to replace it before
> > it's too late. I've not had to do anything like this before, so help! I
> > have a new disk, ready and waiting.
> >
> > The failing drive is partitioned as:
> >       /dev/sda1       ext4    /       37.25 GiB
> >       /dev/sda3       ext4    /home   424.63 GiB
> >       /dev/sda2       extended        3.87 GiB
> >          /dev/sda5    swap

> >
> > After the latest problems, I booted into recovery mode and ran fsck,
> > accepting the default options, to tidy up orphan files.
> >
> > I then installed ddrescue, and put a copy of /dev/sda on an external
> > hard drive:
> >
> >      sudo ddrescue /dev/sda /media/rescue/sda_rescue rescue.log

> >
> > That gives me a 500 GB file. I've also got (stored separately), gz
> > backups of /home.
> >
> > From some of the messages I got when installing ddrescue (from memory,
> > that there's no version information for various packages, assuming they
> > are not installed), I've lost some of the synaptic information.
> >
> > What's my best way forward from here? When I've swapped disks, can I use
> > dd to write my rescued information to the new hard drive?
> >
> > If so, is it advisable to do this, or is it better to do a clean
> > install, and copy over /home from a backup?
> >
> > If I do a clean install, what's the easiest way of getting a list of
> > software that I've installed through synaptic, and reinstalling it?
> >
> > I'm running Mint 13 Mate 64-bit.
>
> If you don't have too much stuff configured (or time is not an issue) I
> would
> opt to do a clean install on the new disk and then copy /home from the
> existing disk.
>
> On debian type systems you can use "dpkg --get-selections" as root to show
> installed packages. If you diff this against a clean install then you
> should
> get a managable number of packages to re-install.
>
> You can also use tar to archive the root partition (ie. tar
> --one-file-system -
> cvf root.tar /) and then restore it on your new disk.
>
> On using dd, if you dd a whole device (/dev/sda), then you store the whole
> geometry. If you dd /dev/sda1, then you only store the filesystem and you
> can
> mount this with loopback options later, which is more flexible. Chances are
> that when you change disks you would usually take the opportunity to put
> more
> storage in. Therefore, recreating the exact device may not be what you are
> after.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Tim B.
> --
> Hampshire Linux User Group Chairman
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>




--
Michael Daffin <james1479@???>
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------