Re: [Hampshire] Data Destruction

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Data Destruction

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x566fd100.hantslug.org.uk.6471': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Fri Oct 7 02:53:50 2011 BST
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hello,

On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:41:04PM +0100, Ian Grody wrote:
> Most software recovery will have problems recovering data after doing a simple zeroing of a drive. Truecrypt does this prior to filling with random data and further xeroing after would give most hardware recoveries problems.


Indeed, it's been demonstrated that just writing over the whole
drive once will give any professional data recovery company severe
problems:

    http://hostjury.com/blog/view/195/the-great-zero-challenge-remains-unaccepted


Anything beyond that is almost getting into tin foil head gear
territory[1]. So DBAN or this Truecrypt plan seem more than
sufficient.

I dispose of around 4-6 hard drives per year at the moment and it's
a bit of a hassle doing this. Still it means that the drives can be
reused by good causes, otherwise I'd probably just take a hammer to
them to be honest.

Cheers,
Andy

[1] If you're concerned about a three letter agency diverting
    a significant portion of their resources into reconstructing
    your data, I don't think we are qualified to advise you. :-)


--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--
Please post to: Hampshire@???
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------