The following may be of interest to some. It's free too!
----- Forwarded message from Jane Morrison <office@???> -----
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:21:27 +0000
From: Jane Morrison <office@???>
Subject: [UKUUG-Announce] BSC - OSSG events: Adoption of Open Source across
HM Government – London 22/02/11 and 01/03/11
Please see below two events organised by the Open Source Specialist Group
(OSSG)
http://ossg.bcs.org that considers adoption of Open Source across HM
Government.
These will be held at the BCS Central London Offices, First Floor, The
Davidson Building, 5 Southampton Street, London WC2E 7HA
(
http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/london-office-guide.pdf)) on:
Tuesday 22nd February 2011, and Tuesday 1st March 2011 both from 1800 to 2100.
These bookable events are free and open to all with buffet and refreshments. To
book a place to attend please contact:
Mark Elkins via mark_elkins@???
A member of the Home Office IT Team is undertaking research in conjunction with
the Cabinet Office to:
(1) try and understand why Open Source is not represented better across HMG
and the wider public sector, and
(2) identify and address barriers to adoption of Open Source across HMG and
the wider public sector.
Context
1. The Coalition Government believes Open Source Software can
deliver significant short and long term cost savings across
Government IT.
2. Typical benefits of Open Source include lower procurement
prices, no license costs, interoperability, easier integration and
customisation, compliance with open technology and data standards
giving autonomy over your own information and freedom from vendor
lock in.
3. OSS is not currently widely used in Government IT, and the
leading systems integrators for Government Departments do not
routinely consider open source software for IT solution options, as
required by existing HMG ICT policy.
4. There are significant and wide ranging obstacles to Open
Source in Government. Some of these are lack of procurement
guidance, resistance from suppliers, concerns about license
obligations and patent issues, and a lack of understanding of open
source maturity and its development ecosystem.
Debates
The debates will focus on (1) understanding the barriers to wider
adoption of Open Source across HMG, and (2) potential solutions to
these barriers.
We will aim to have representatives from major IT suppliers to HMG
to help us understand the barriers from their perspective, and to
help us understand how well any proposed solutions might work. The
debates should be more a dialogue with the IT suppliers than amongst
OSS supporters.
Evening Debate 1 – Tuesday 22nd February
1. Supplier Challenge – how can we incentivize the traditional IT suppliers to
consider OSS when evaluation software options?
Suitable OSS is not currently being considered equally – why?What are the
disincentives for IT suppliers? In-house skills. New support relationships
with OSS vendors and support companies. Any others?If they do work with OSS,
how can we be sure the cost benefits are passed onto customers?
2. Procurement – how can it be better?
What are the current obstacles? Do the existing contracts and frameworks
discourage OSS – if so, how?
3. OSS Assessment Model – working with IT suppliers
IT suppliers aren’t very open with how they select software as
candidates for evaluation – not sustainable when spending taxpayers
money.We can help make this more transparent by working with them to
build an assessment model they can sign up to. What would suppliers like
to include in this assessment ? I have started a model to de
developed. List of top software per category (virtualisation, monitoring,
email, collaboration, etc) – needs to be maintained to be useful, but
will get the ball rolling in current lack of knowledge.
4. Case Studies – evidence of short and long term value for money.
Where are these? Also proven examples of OSS use in high demand, volume
or availability applications.
5. Other Ideas – especially for the next debate.
Evening Debate 2 – Tuesday 1st March
1. Security. OSS is insecure compared to commercial software?
By what criteria can we select software to minimise security risks?Does OSS
need a different approach to patching?Can we simply use empirical evidence when
comparing OSS with closed software? Statistics for internet browsers are
common – published vulnerabilities, known exploits, time to fixKey question for
HMG is – all things being equal, open code means vulnerabilities can be
discovered and exploited before there is time to fix
2. Buy-not-Build. Can OSS actually benefit HMG because HMG doesn’t want custom
or re-engineered software?
HMG generally asks IT suppliers to build systems from COTS components and
minimise customisation and re-engineering – it wasn’t want to maintain special
code because of cost and risk. So does a significant benefit of OSS not apply
to HMG?
3. Legal advice for OSS
OSS has some unique legal aspects compared with commercial software –
where to get advice? Myths around legal obstacles and obligations are
going unchallenged.Patents and liability issues are often raised – resolved by
major OSS suppliers who will shield customers?
4. Long Term Strategy
OSS won’t happen overnight.Should we work backwards from insisting on open
information formats for HMG interactions with the public and other sectors?
This way the use of open standards compliant software filters back into HMG
organisations.
5. Other Ideas
-------------------------------------------------------
--
UKUUG Secretariat
PO Box 37
Buntingford
Herts SG9 9UQ
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Adam Trickett
Overton, HANTS, UK
This would of course be likely to trigger a real constitutional crisis,
but as this Government has done so much to destroy the constitution
already, it seems only reasonable for other people to be allowed to join in.
-- John Lettice, The Register 2006-01-17
