Re: [Hampshire] Home fileserving architecture

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Leo
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Home fileserving architecture
You may already know this, but if not one option would be to set up your
server to switch itself on and off as required. That's what I've done
with mine; it switches itself on just before people usually get home,
and then switches itself later in evening, unless there is someone still
connected to it. If anyone wants to switch it on any other time, they
just use Wake-on-LAN.

Leo

On 17/09/10 02:22, Anthony wrote:
> At home I've a fileserver PC and Ubuntu clients including one that's
> ended up needing to be left on 24/7. I'm thinking of moving the
> server's 2 disks to the always-on desktop box to save electricity. All
> PCs are on a wifi ADSL router using Cat5 and WPA, and we've an
> (untrusted) lodger. Backups are nightly between encrypted server disks,
> and approx weekly an incremental to an unencrypted USB drive which is
> locked away. [*]
>
> Have I thought of all the pros and cons, and how should I secure this
> arrangement (especially NFS)?
>
> Power: saves 25%
>      same disk count, one less mobo

>
> LAN security: no change - is it enough?
>      client login passwords; static client IPs;
>      NFS exports to individual IPs;
>      encrypted data disks; ssh with passwords

>
> Physical security: worse.
>      fileserver is in the loft,
>      PC and router are on the desk

>
> Noise: OK
>      desktop gets 3 quiet Barracuda disks

>
> Speed: got a PCI-IDE card
>      so each disk can be on its own channel

>
> Future expansion: costly
>      will need to replace with larger disks.
>      2 channel PCI card =>  only add 1 more disk

>
> Stability: not sure.
>      The 24/7 desktop has mostly run between power cuts so far.  Apps are
>      installed as needed mostly from universe and there's a spare PC for
>      reboots e.g. learning grub2.  Browser memory leaks eventually fill
>      swap and fell the box: the browser could be run in a VM to avoid
>      this.

>
> Bring on the advice please!
>
> Anthony
>
>
> * story in a nutshell; some features not yet implemented quite like
> that.
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@???
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>