[Hampshire] Allegations made by "LinuxLearner" (Was: Re: stu…

Top Page
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
To: hampshire
Old-Topics: Re: [Hampshire] stuart biggs added you as a business connectionon Plaxo
Subject: [Hampshire] Allegations made by "LinuxLearner" (Was: Re: stuartbiggs added you as a business connection on Plaxo)

Reply to this message
gpg: failed to create temporary file '/var/lib/lurker/.#lk0x57114100.hantslug.org.uk.12698': Permission denied
gpg: keyblock resource '/var/lib/lurker/pubring.gpg': Permission denied
gpg: Signature made Tue Feb 2 07:33:04 2010 GMT
gpg: using DSA key 2099B64CBF15490B
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Hello,

In general I have no interest in responding to "LinuxLearner"'s
trolling, but he has made some accusations which I feel I need to
set straight for the record. This is a publicly archived mailing
list and his unfortunate post may be stumbled upon by anyone.

On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 02:19:52AM +0000, LinuxLearner wrote:
> a quick search reveals neither Andy Smith, Andrew Smith, nor
> Bitfolk Ltd *seem* to be registered as data controllers as
> required by law ... Which rather puts your businesses claim
> "BitFolk takes your privacy very seriously" in a somewhat, shall
> we say, a laughable light,


I have no idea why it doesn't appear, but anyone who believes that
we hold personal data on them is welcome to contact me offlist for a
copy of our DPR declaration form as sent to ICO a couple of years
ago. They have certainly had no qualms in taking £35/yr for it ever
since. The form isn't very interesting though as it's just the
template for "Internet service provider" i.e. basically:

Purposes:

    Accounts and records


        Subjects
            Customers and clients


        Classes
            Family, lifestyle and social circumstances
            Goods or services provided
            Personal details


        Recipients
            Data subjects themselves
            Ombudsmen and regulatory authorities
            Suppliers, providers of goods or services


        Transfers
            None outside the EEA 


It's all very vague.

> But you are displaying what we northerners call a bit of the 'Pot
> calling the kettle black', when you gripe about businesses not
> being compliant, but yours isn't, either.


I have not made any accusation of DPA non-compliance in this thread,
and I would urge anyone reading this to not take allegations made by
"LinuxLearner" at face value. Subscribing to Surrey LUG and then
perusing their (sadly closed) archives will be enlightening.

Cheers,
Andy

--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting