Re: [Hampshire] Email return-to-sender - who has dropped wha…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Victor Churchill
Date:  
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Email return-to-sender - who has dropped what where?
2009/11/3 Simon Huggins <huggie@???>:
>> That line "for name=data.h-ems.com.h-ems.com type=A: Host not found"
>> looks to me almost like a blatant typo/clerical error in somebody's
>> setup.
>
> Yes.  Looks like the classic missing . in a zonefile:
>
> The MX for h-ems.com is:
> [huggie@the ~]$ dig -t MX h-ems.com +short
> 10 data.h-ems.com.h-ems.com.
>
> Yet:
> [huggie@the ~]$ dig -t any data.h-ems.com.h-ems.com +short
> [huggie@the ~]$ dig -t any data.h-ems.com +short
> 213.232.95.114
>
> So they probably meant to set their MX to data.h-ems.com.
>


Thank you Simon, that seems to confirm the suspicions I had. Strange,
because the recipient seems to think the destination address is fine
("from their end")! Maybe it works from within their internal network
but not from outside.