Re: [Hampshire] Bash script interruptions

トップ ページ

このメッセージに返信
著者: Paul Stimpson
日付:  
To: Hampshire LUG Mailing List
題目: Re: [Hampshire] Bash script interruptions
SIGKILL - That doesn't sound a very nice way to handle a child process when its parent gets SIGINTed (Die with no chance of doing a tidy exit.) Would not a more logical thing be to send be a SIGHUP? (Your logical control terminal has gone away.)

Just wondering why they did it that way.

Cheers,
Paul.


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device