Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question

著者: Steve Kemp
日付: 2008-02-28 20:26 -000
To: adam.trickett, Hampshire LUG Discussion List
CC:
題目: Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question

On Thu Feb 28, 2008 at 20:23:16 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:

> My ByteMark server is UML and works quite well. As good as UML is I don't
> think it's a technology of the future - but then again I may be wrong...

UML suffers when you're doing heavy disk I/O, but otherwise is stable
well supported and useful.

Steve
--
# Commercial Debian GNU/Linux Support
http://www.linux-administration.org/

このメッセージは次のスレッドの一部です:
	日付によるスレッドの仕分け
	Adam Trickett 、 2008-02-28 20:25
	Steve Kemp 、 2008-02-28 20:33