Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question

Startseite
Diese Nachricht ist Teil des folgenden Threads:
MDer komplette Thread sortiert nach Datum
MAdam Trickett am <-
MSteve Kemp am ->

Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Steve Kemp
Datum:  
To: adam.trickett, Hampshire LUG Discussion List
CC: 
Betreff: Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question
On Thu Feb 28, 2008 at 20:23:16 +0000, Adam Trickett wrote:

> My ByteMark server is UML and works quite well. As good as UML is I don't
> think it's a technology of the future - but then again I may be wrong...

UML suffers when you're doing heavy disk I/O, but otherwise is stable
well supported and useful.

Steve
--
# Commercial Debian GNU/Linux Support
http://www.linux-administration.org/



Diese Nachricht wurde auf der folgenden Mailing-List gepostet:
Hampshire LUG
Mailing-List-Info | Nachrichten um die Zeit		<-Re: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation QuestionRe: [Hampshire] Yet Another Virtualisation Question->
Unconfigured Archivew administriert von WebmasterLurker (Version 2.3)